: A man lost his appeal in the Court of Appeal today to claim RM29,000 in unpaid salary from a cleaning services company owned by a Bangladeshi national.
Delivering the court’s decision, Justice Ahmad Zaidi said there was no merit in Gunasegaran’s appeal. Justice Ahmad Zaidi pointed out the absence of salary slip, contribution to SOCSO and Employees Provident Fund to back Gunasegaran’s claim that he was employed by the company. He said Section 11 of the Contract Act 1950 did not apply in this case and the High Court’s ruling that the letter of appointment was void, was erroneous.
เราได้สรุปข่าวนี้มาให้อ่านอย่างรวดเร็ว หากสนใจข่าว สามารถอ่านฉบับเต็มได้ที่นี่ อ่านเพิ่มเติม: