The court said Mr Tan's conduct was particularly"disgraceful and appalling" because he had used his professional status to give the client false assurance that the client's interests will be safeguarded.
Mr Kuek signed two letters of engagement under Keystone's letterhead, stating that the law firm would oversee his investments.Mr Kuek said Mr Tan had assured him that his money would be protected and that issuing the cheque to Bluesky was"the same" as paying Keystone.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more: