Mpofu didn't communicate intention to withdraw from inquiry: Mkhwebane - SABC News - Breaking news, special reports, world, business, sport coverage of all South African current events. Africa's news leader.

  • 📰 SABCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 53 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States News News

United States United States Latest News,United States United States Headlines

ICYMI: The suspended Public Protector, Busisiwe Mkhwebane, says her legal representatives, Advocate Dali Mpofu and his team, did not communicate with her their intention to withdraw from her Section 192 Inquiry.

She says she cannot proceed without her legal team.

On Thursday, Mkhwebane said she wanted the Parliamentary inquiry probing her fitness to hold office to halt its work for now. The Western Cape High Court will rule on her looming review application challenging the dismissal of her recusal application against chairperson Qubudile Dyantyi and Democratic Alliance MP Kevin Mileham.Mkhwebane’s legal counsel said they have an “open and shut” case against the dismissal of the recusal application.

They argued that if the inquiry continues with its work while there is a review application against recusal application dismissal, then the inquiry would render its conduct in contempt of court.On Tuesday, Judgment was reserved in the case brought by Mkhwebane for leave to appeal the Western Cape High Court dismissal of her application to be allowed to return to the office.

They say as the court ruled that its decision was effective immediately at the time, she is entitled to go back to work even while awaiting the confirmation of the Constitutional Court.Share article

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 37. in US
 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Delete this post n apologise

That is what you said nje

She took after her BF..zuma delay the process and avoid to be grilled this the finalisation of the matter in the Constitutional Court...

Fake news

Their withdrawal is an old tactic to force a postponement. I bet my entire CD collection that Dali and company will be back representing her as soon as the court hands down judgment. Until then the PP will say she is searching for new lawyers and the need time

Ga a bue nnete gotlhelele.

If he is being paid by the PP's office then there should be a breach of contract which must result in him reimbursing the office a certain amount already paid to him, and forfeiting the rest due

But guys you do know that we watched the same things as you though right? Like why do y’all lie about things we all saw?🥴

Tsek! Misleading headlines...

🤮😡 😡 😡 🤮 Lies!!! Lies!!! Lies!!! Lies Everywhere to shape court of Opinions. Lies everyday. Shameless🤮

SABC this joined media24 to peddle lies. That spaza shop must be close since its useless

You are part of

The rot that we see paraded here is nauseating. Dali knows that he will lose so with his client & the EFF interested party that has ALREADY taken a side in this matter, Dali makes a plan to drag the process out. Mkhwebane remains in courts until the end of her disastrous tenure.

That not what she said. Why lie unprovoked?

We know it was a strategy to force the postponement but it backfired ... She is just lying 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️ Section what .. 🙄?

Remember that's how Mpofu advised former president Jacob Zuma to walk out of state capture commission..

So this woman chose to lie..that means Mpofu and team bridged the Lpc guidelines by walking out without telling their client

AdvBMkhwebane should have long been impeached as she employs Zuma's playbook!

194*

AdvBMkhwebane Dear SABC , it is Section 194 not 192. AdvDali_Mpofu is not briefed by the client (Public Protector Advocate Mkhwebane). He is briefed (and mandated) by Seanego attorneys. Counsel is allowed to withdraw from a case or to surrender a brief. Blessed 😇

Was it necessary for SABC to be dishonest the opening statement of the PP she allued she was in communication with her attorney and give some for the reasons from her attorney read read read read

Why lie ?

194

I -scratch -your- back...you-scratch mine-type of situation unfolding right before our eyes

Yeah right....... What's the one of the problems they have with you?

O maka in broad daylight! This one never learn hey!

Lies!!!

The game they are playing is childish,I hope when others in opposition starts with such games they won't complain

And you really believe this

Where are you born to be a public protector for life?

Don't believe a liar.

So Mpofu and Seanego attorneys are in breach of LPC guidelines by withdrawing from the case without the mandate or communication with the client?

These Forex trader bots are annoying AF!

Selokhu aphatha leskhuñdla lomama akakaze asebenza into eqondile ukhuluma amacala nje

United States United States Latest News, United States United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Mpofu didn't communicate intention to withdraw from inquiry: Mkhwebane - SABC News - Breaking news, special reports, world, business, sport coverage of all South African current events. Africa's news leader.ICYMI: The suspended Public Protector, Busisiwe Mkhwebane, says her legal representatives, Advocate Dali Mpofu and his team, did not communicate with her their intention to withdraw from her Section 192 Inquiry. Selokhu aphatha leskhuñdla lomama akakaze asebenza into eqondile ukhuluma amacala nje These Forex trader bots are annoying AF! So Mpofu and Seanego attorneys are in breach of LPC guidelines by withdrawing from the case without the mandate or communication with the client?
Source: SABCNews - 🏆 37. / 51 Read more »