A decision posted Monday says the wildfire near Nazko, in central B.C., burned about four square kilometres after escaping from a debris pile that a contractor set on fire at a Tolko Industries cut block.Sign up to receive daily headline news from the Calgary Herald, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Tolko initially won an appeal through the Forest Appeals Commission, which overturned the pay order saying the company was exempt under the Wildfire Regulation because it didn’t intend to start the fire and it found the blaze was a result of forestry activity.Article content “The language does not require the person to intend to start a wildfire that accidentally spreads from a wilfully lit controlled fire,” he says in his decision.
The Supreme Court decision says in general, timber harvesting results in a significant amount of debris piled along forest roads for subsequent disposal by burning, usually in winter.
เราได้สรุปข่าวนี้มาให้อ่านอย่างรวดเร็ว หากสนใจข่าว สามารถอ่านฉบับเต็มได้ที่นี่ อ่านเพิ่มเติม:
ประเทศไทย ข่าวล่าสุด, ประเทศไทย หัวข้อข่าว
Similar News:คุณยังสามารถอ่านข่าวที่คล้ายกันนี้ซึ่งเรารวบรวมจากแหล่งข่าวอื่น ๆ ได้
B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppressionVANCOUVER — A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost-recovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a wildfire in 2016. A decision posted Monday says the wildfire near Nazko, in central B.C.
แหล่ง: timescolonist - 🏆 15. / 75 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of fighting 2016 wildfireA B.C. Supreme Court judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost\u002Drecovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a wildfire in 2016.
แหล่ง: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppressionSupreme Court Justice Michael Brundrett says in his decision that the Forest Appeals Commission made a mistake when it interpreted ‘fire’ to mean ‘wildfire,’ separating the intentional act of starting the burn pile from the wildfire that followed
แหล่ง: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppressionA B.C. judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost-recovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a wildfire in 2016.
แหล่ง: CHEK_News - 🏆 59. / 55 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »
B.C. court rules forestry company must pay $343,000 cost of 2016 wildfire suppressionVANCOUVER — A British Columbia Supreme Court judge has upheld more than $343,000 in cost\u002Drecovery fines that were handed to a forestry company for starting a…
แหล่ง: OttawaCitizen - 🏆 21. / 68 อ่านเพิ่มเติม »