Government admits consultation came after social media laws were introduced

  • 📰 abcnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 83%

Business Business Headlines News

Business Business Latest News,Business Business Headlines

Communications Minister Mitch Fifield concedes the Government had already introduced new laws that impose heavy fines for failing to remove violent content to Parliament before consulting social media companies.

Under the legislation, social media companies risk fines of up to 10 per cent of the platform's annual turnover if they fail to remove violent content"expeditiously".However, the legal community and technology companies have criticised the Government for failing to adequately consult stakeholders.

Appearing before Senate Estimates, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation said it would have liked to have been consulted about the laws. "We certainly understand and appreciate the intention of it, and we accept that the intention is not to prevent reputable media organisations undertaking reputable behaviour," he said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Typical poor process from this government. Will social media platforms just block Aust content?

They probably wanted to impose the laws before Christchurch and were just waiting for the right time, lucky for them 50 people were massacred....

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in BUSİNESS

Business Business Latest News, Business Business Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

New laws could see social media bosses jailed for hosting terrorist contentSocial media executives could be jailed and their companies fined billions of dollars if they fail to remove terrorist material like the Christchurch massacre live stream under proposed new laws. There must be balance. New laws shall be passed but let's not go all china hey? Like realDonaldTrump ? Our Democracy can be saved if we Silence his Nazi posts on social media! The bill attacks these social media companies for what they were trying their best to stop but does nothing to stop the hate speech or pages belonging to White Supremacists or Nazi organisations. This is another case where the PM might as well have done nothing. auspol
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

Warnings over rushed social media lawsThe legislation will see social media executives jailed if they did not immediately take down footage of terrorist acts. 9News
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »

Social media laws ‘rushed through’ | Sky News AustraliaFULL INTERVIEW: Law Council President Arthur Moses says legislation cracking down on social media companies republishing abhorrent content has been ‘rushed through’ without proper scrutiny.\n\nSocial Media workers could face criminal sanctions if they do not withdraw videos of terrorist or violent conduct under a new law passed by parliament on Thursday.\n\nThe legislation was tabled in response to the Christchurch massacre, where the accused gunman streamed his attack on two mosques live on Facebook.\n\nMr Moses told Sky News the laws may have ‘unintended consequences’ on the media.\n\n\n David_Speers What a joke..... David_Speers Australia is Cambodia pre Kampuchea, tick toc. David_Speers If this continues, a point will be reached where social media will serve no purpose except displaying your breakfast. Oh wait, maybe not, if vegans win their arguments 😒
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »